Support the component without introducing pinch points or unstable rocking.

Application engineering
Track geometry decides how the component behaves.
Design the contact path, clearances and restraint around the real datum surfaces—not an idealised drawing alone.
Surface and coating choices respond to friction, marking, wear and cleanability.
Allow inspection, cleaning and jam clearance without losing critical settings.
Purpose-designed contact
A / 01The part should be supported where it is strongest and controlled where it can move.
Track tooling must preserve the required orientation through acceleration, stopping and queueing. Rail position, channel depth, cover clearance and transitions are assessed against all accepted component tolerances.
Samples often reveal moulding variation, burrs, oil, static, surface texture or nesting tendencies that a CAD model cannot predict.
A successful profile remains tolerant of production variation while rejecting conditions that could compromise the downstream process.
Track engineering
Key design decisions.
Datum control
Locate and support the surfaces that define the required presentation while allowing free forward movement.
Clearance strategy
Allow dimensional variation without creating excessive freedom, rotation, wedging or double stacking.
Transition design
Manage changes between bowl discharge, inline track, sensor station and escapement without steps or bounce points.
Contact material
Select stainless steel, engineered polymer, liner or coating by friction, wear, cleanliness and marking risk.
Cover & restraint
Prevent lifting, overlap or escape where the component can ride up under queue pressure.
Changeover
Use adjustable rails or verified change parts only where repeatable setup and component range make them practical.
Failure-mode review
Look for instability before it becomes a stoppage.
The final profile should be challenged with minimum and maximum tolerance parts, different batches and realistic contamination or finish conditions where safe and relevant.
- Shingling, overlap and double presentation
- Rotation or datum loss during queueing
- Wedging at rail, cover or transition points
- Nesting or interlocking component geometries
- Cosmetic marking and contact damage
- Debris traps and inaccessible cleaning points
Design inputs
Information that changes the track concept.
Nominal dimensions, tolerances, material, mass and centre-of-gravity clues.
Actual friction, flash, burrs, oil, static, variation and nesting behaviour.
The exact surface and rotational condition needed by the next process.
Cosmetic faces, seals, coated areas or functional surfaces that must be protected.
Access, drainage, material compatibility and tool-removal expectations.
Shared geometry, change parts, adjustment points and poka-yoke requirements.
Common questions
Linear feeder questions, answered.
Practical guidance for an early project review. Final design and performance are confirmed against the actual application.
01What materials are linear feeder tracks made from?+
Stainless steel and aluminium are common structural choices, with engineered polymers, liners or coatings used where the application needs different friction, wear, noise, marking or cleanliness characteristics. The correct choice is component- and environment-specific.
02Can one track handle several component sizes?+
Sometimes. Closely related variants may use adjustable guides or change parts, but the repeatability of setup and the worst-case clearances must be proven. A universal track can compromise stability if the range is too wide.
03Why are production samples necessary?+
Drawings do not fully describe friction, moulding flash, burrs, residual oil, static, batch variation or how parts interlock. Representative samples allow the design assumptions to be tested.
Start with the component
Need a stable path to the next machine?
Send a part photo or drawing, the required orientation and sustainable rate. We will help define the right linear feeding approach.
Request an application review